This system
Except for a number of private issues, such as account names, passwords, etcetera, this section
is an ongoing attempt on to describe in detail all of my ongoing efforts to configure this server
system with all kinds of hard- and software that I know of and make use of. For years I've been
a stickler for documentation anyway and have amassed an extensive collection of personal tech
notes, so I figured that sharing them all in the spirit of Open Source would not only give me an
excuse to update my website, but also to organize them all and keep them up to date. At the same
time it will serve to demonstrate some of what I know and like, and with a little luck it will
even attract some comments from other people.
Hardware
Ever since I set up my first server in 1994, I've always built them myself from components.
Nothing special: just normal off-the-shelf PC hardware. These days I use three basically
identical Chieftec chassis for my server, workstation and a spare. When the time comes, I use
the spare chassis to build the new workstation, after which I use that to build the new server
with, replacing only the hard disks. I do this every three years, mainly to reduce the risk of
disk failure, but also to take advantage of faster components. This strategy has a number of
advantages:
- It saves me money, since it would be more expensive to replace both systems completely every
three years.
- It allows me to take my time to replace both systems: I only have to replace the old one
with the new one when I feel it's ready.
- Since the "new" server's motherboard is always three years old to begin with, I never have
any teething problems with it. If there were ever any problems with one or more of its
subcomponents not being supported by the software, by this time those problems will have
disappeared.
- It makes more sense from an environmental point of view, since over time I contribute less
hardware to the world's computer scrap heaps.
Software
Since 2001 I've only used Debian GNU/Linux: the stable version for my server and the unstable
version for my workstation. The reason is the mountain of software packages available through
this distribution, as well as the fact that it's free and has a large support base. Where the
configuration is concerned it is also more flexible than other distributions. Sure, there are
occasionally some problems that must be dealt with, especially when using the unstable
version, but I've always been able to handle these problems and in my opinion they cerainly
don't weigh up against the advantages.
Last modified: 2017-08-02, 17:30
©2003-2020 RJ Systems. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify the
content of this page under the terms of the OpenContent License, version 1.0.
|